Automating Donor Stewardship with Agentforce
- Peter, Ohana Focus Team

- Jan 18
- 4 min read

By Ohana Focus | January 20, 2025 | 22 min read
Your development team spends hours drafting personalized thank-you emails and researching donor histories. Salesforce Agentforce brings autonomous AI agents to donor stewardship, handling time-consuming research and drafting while your team focuses on authentic relationship building.
Here we'll learn how Agentforce differs from traditional automation, which five use cases save the most time, what implementation requires, and how to use AI ethically in donor relationships.
Understanding Agentforce: What's Different
Salesforce announced Agentforce in late 2024—a platform for building autonomous AI agents that take actions, not just provide insights.
The Evolution
Traditional Automation (Flow):
Pre-programmed logic: 'When X happens, do Y.' Can only do exactly what you programmed. No judgment, no learning.
Einstein AI (Predictive):
Analyzes patterns, makes predictions. Tells you what might happen but doesn't actually do anything. Humans must act on insights.
Agentforce (Autonomous):
Understands context, makes decisions and takes actions autonomously. Combines analysis + decision-making + action within guardrails you define.
What Agentforce Agents Can Do
• Access and analyze data (donor history, patterns, relationships)
• Generate content (draft emails, briefing notes, messages)
• Make recommendations (suggest next actions based on analysis)
• Take actions (create records, update fields, send emails with approval)
• Learn from feedback (improve based on what staff accepts/rejects)
• Interact conversationally (staff can chat with agents)
Five Agentforce Donor Stewardship Use Cases That Deliver Value
Personalized Thank You Email Drafts
Challenge: Development officers write dozens of thank-you emails weekly. Making each personal and referencing donor history is time-consuming.
What agent does:
• Triggers when a gift is recorded
• Analyzes complete donor history
• Drafts email incorporating specific details
• Saves draft for review
Human role: Review draft, add personal touches, adjust tone, send.
Time saved: 8 minutes per email × 50 emails weekly = 6.7 hours weekly
Donor Briefings for Calls and Meetings
Challenge: Before meetings, officers need to review years of history. Manual review takes 15-30 minutes per meeting.
What agent does:
• Compiles comprehensive briefing
• Includes: lifetime giving, recent engagement, family connections, interests
• Suggests talking points
• Delivers as a task attachment or email
Time saved: 20 minutes per meeting × 20 meetings monthly = 6.7 hours monthly
Lapse Risk Identification and Intervention
Challenge: Donors lapse silently. Proactive intervention when early warning signals appear is more effective than reactive re-engagement.
What agent does:
• Runs weekly, analyzing all active donors
• Identifies early lapse signals
• Scores lapse risk (High/Medium/Low)
• Drafts re-engagement emails and suggests interventions
Impact: 15-25% improvement in retention vs. reactive approaches
Cultivation Path Recommendations
Challenge: What should I do next with this prospect? Officers are often uncertain about optimal next touches.
What agent does:
• Analyzes prospect's stage and engagement history
• Compares to successful cultivation paths for similar donors
• Recommends next 2-3 actions
• Updates as actions completed
Acknowledgment and Reporting Compliance
Challenge: IRS requires timely acknowledgment for gifts over $250. Manually tracking is tedious and error-prone.
What agent does:
• Monitors all gifts for acknowledgment status
• Tracks deadlines and sends escalating reminders
• Generates weekly compliance reports
• Can draft acknowledgment letters when needed
Implementation Strategy

Prerequisites:
• Clean, accurate Salesforce data
• Comprehensive donor history logged consistently
• Clear stewardship processes
• Staff buy-in and understanding
• Salesforce licenses supporting Agentforce
• Data governance policies
• Review and approval workflows defined
Phase 1: Start with One Use Case (6-8 weeks)
Recommended first: Donor briefings for meetings. Low risk (internal use), high value (immediate time savings), easy to measure.
• Week 1-2: Requirements definition, data audit
• Week 3-4: Agent configuration, testing
• Week 5-6: Pilot with 2-3 officers, gather feedback
• Weeks 7-8: Expand to full team, monitor, measure
Phase 2: Expand to Additional Use Cases
• Months 2-3: Thank you email drafts
• Months 4-6: Lapse risk identification
• Months 7-9: Cultivation path recommendations
• Month 10+: Compliance monitoring
Maintaining Authenticity: The Human + AI Partnership

AI Agent's Role (Efficiency):
• Research donor history
• Compile information from multiple sources
• Draft initial content
• Suggest next actions based on data
Human's Role (Authenticity):
• Add personal touches from relationship knowledge
• Adjust tone to match authentic voice
• Make judgment calls on sensitive situations
• Build genuine emotional connection
The 80/20 Rule
AI handles 80% of the research and drafting work, while humans focus on the 20% related to authentic relationship building and judgment.
Before AI: 30 min per email (25 min research/drafting, 5 min personalizing)
With AI: 5 min per email (agent drafts in 30 seconds, human adds personal touches in 5 min)
Result: Same quality, 25 minutes saved, can scale to 6x volume
Ethical Considerations
Transparency with Donors
Recommended approach: Don't lead with 'AI drafted this,' but be honest if asked. Focus on human review and relationship building.
Data Privacy and Security
• Minimize data access to what's necessary
• Maintain audit trails
• Respect donor privacy preferences
• Secure storage of agent-generated content
Bias and Fairness
Mitigation strategies:
• Regular audits across donor segments
• Diverse perspectives in design
• Human oversight for all recommendations
• Feedback mechanisms to flag bias
Measuring Impact
Efficiency Metrics
• Time saved: 30-40% reduction target
• Volume increase: 50-100% more personalized touches
• Response time: 50% faster thank-you sends
Quality Metrics
• Staff satisfaction: 80%+ find helpful
• Draft acceptance rate: 70%+ used with minor edits
• Recommendation accuracy: 60%+ followed
Implementation Costs
• Single use case: $5,000-$12,000
• Multiple use cases (3-5 agents): $20,000-$40,000
• Ongoing optimization: $2,000-$5,000 annually
Timeline
• Pilot (single use case): 6-8 weeks
• Full implementation (multiple use cases): 4-6 months
• Optimization: Ongoing based on feedback
Partner with Ohana Focus

Expert Agentforce implementation for nonprofits. Schedule your consultation today.
Ohana Focus specializes in helping nonprofits implement Salesforce Agentforce strategically and ethically. We understand both the technology and the dynamics of donor relationships. Our Agentforce services include:
• Strategic assessment
• Data readiness audit
• Agent design and configuration
• Prompt engineering
• Approval workflow design
• Pilot implementation
• Staff training
• Ethical framework development
• Ongoing optimization
About Ohana Focus
Ohana Focus is a certified Salesforce consulting partner specializing in nonprofit AI implementation and donor stewardship strategy. We help organizations leverage emerging technologies like Agentforce to enhance fundraising effectiveness while maintaining authentic donor relationships.
Our team combines deep Salesforce technical expertise with practical fundraising experience. We understand how development shops work, what donor relationships require, and where technology helps versus where it creates problems.
Topics: Salesforce Agentforce, AI Automation, Donor Stewardship, Einstein AI, Nonprofit AI, Autonomous Agents, Fundraising Technology



Comments